Weezer vs. the Record Industry
Guess who won. You can find out who won the epic battle for control over the shape of Weezer’s new album in the latest Glorious Noise Feature. Check it out now.
Well, I picked up the new Weezer album today. Even though I had the opportunity
for weeks to download the mp3s, for some inexplicable reason I decided to wait
for the official release. I didn’t even go to Vertigo Records yesterday to beg my man
Herm to sell me one a day early like I did five years ago when Pinkerton came out.
Back in 1996, it was embarrassing for a guy my age (25 then) to be excited about the new
Weezer album. But by that time I had already accepted the first Weezer album as a pop
masterpiece, and thanks to my man Colin,
I’d already totally gone crazy over the moog madness of the Rentals’ first album.
Since then my love of Weezer has not waned.
I’m a nut — ask any of my
friends or especially my wife. I get obsessed about bands and burn myself out.
I inherited this trait from my cousin Mike who first turned me on to the full
power of music in the form of those Knights In Satan’s Service, KISS. When the
King died, Mike and I went on a huge Elvis kick. His older Dazed and
Confused-era
brother got us into The River and then the Doors. AC/DC was in there
somewhere — probably when Bon Scott died. As we got older, Mike and I drifted
apart as he fully embraced the Metal side of things and I queered off
into Duran Duran, Tears for Fears and, heaven forbid, Wham! I eventually ended up
with the Beatles, the Smiths and the Dead Milkmen
as my high school soundtrack. The Stone Roses were coming up as I graduated.
And for each of these bands, I became totally obsessed and had to hear
everything they ever recorded and read every interview they ever gave. This
was a lot tougher back in the days before the Web and Napster. I had pen pals in the UK
who would record radio performances and send cassettes to me. I became a bootleg tape
trader. It’s ridiculous. College broadened my musical horizons but it didn’t
chill me out at all. Neither has marriage. I’ve gone crazy about britpop,
Parliament-Funkadelic, NWA-related hip hop, Frank Sinatra and Neil Young.
There are tons of other bands that I was into that are more embarrassing,
but you get the picture.
Which brings us back to Weezer. I started to get nervous about the new album
in October 2000 when I heard that Ric Ocasek was going to be the producer. He
produced the first album and this seemed like a real step backwards. But he’s
better than the guy who produces Blink-182 and the guy who produces Radiohead,
who were both being considered. Weezer fifth member and lousy speller, Karl, had
posted this frank
disclosure on his website a month before:
9/13/2000: The hammer comes down… today the band learned
from Interscope that they CANNOT start recording the new album unless they definately
have a producer! This flies in the face of the band’s insistence on starting on
October 23 "by any means necessary", and puts a serious damper on their
hopes for getting the new record off the ground on schedule…
So it was obvious that the Record Company was already messing with the sound of
Weezer. They were making it clear to the band the next Weezer record was going to
sound the way They wanted it to sound, regardless of what the band wanted.
This was the next alarming post
from Karl:
11/15/2000: …Well, today weezer was visited in their home
studio garage by the president
of Geffen records, whose views of what weezer was doing were fairly unknown to
date. We found out today, to the bands delight, that he is a very cool guy who
thinks the new songs are "awesome", and he had lots of good ideas and
suggestions for the band as they continue to write and record brand new songs
and refine the slightly "older" ones from the past few weeks.
I actually don’t even know who the president of Geffen Records is, but I can’t
honestly imagine a corporate executive having many good ideas about anything,
much less about how a great rock and roll album is supposed to sound. Was Karl
betraying us, or just being enthusiastic because the exec "gave his full
approval to the bands plan to get Ric out here and start album work in December!"?
I’m willing to give Karl the benefit of the doubt because he seems like a good
guy and not a professional spin master. Ten days into the actual recording of
the new album, Karl posted this:
01/06/2001:…recording day 10… In the midst of
finishing up Mikey’s bass "fixes", Weezer recieved a visit from the
record company, and were suprised to learn that they were unsatisfied with how
several tracks were turning out so far. Despite the fact that the songs are in a
very raw form and will be much farther along in just a few weeks, the comments
were still fairly critical, even while other songs got positive remarks. This of
course is not the best news we could have gotten, as dissention from "on
high" can lead to unwanted delays. And as we all are aware, there is very
little margin for error here. Extending the album sessions could adversly affect
the tour schedule, and conversely, sticking to the tour schedule in spite of not
finishing the album work could mean a delayed release. Both of these outcomes
are the last thing anyone wants, so the guys are continuing to work extra hard
to get all the tracks as top-notch as possible.
…Very lengthy debates and discussions of what should/shouldnt/could be done
with the tracks led to renewed attempts to nail down some songs. Later, after
intensive internal debate within the band, a few songs got "the boot",
their slots in the final running taken over by others that were "bubbling
under". Additionally, another song, "Gonna Make My Move" was
given a first time attempt.
The next day Karl posted
the following, I assume, to calm down fans who (like
me, I admit) were freaking out:
01/07/2001:…recording day 11…The hard work is really
paying off, and the guys are determined to make this album their own way.
Suggestions and criticisms come in all flavors, and some are helpful, some
useless. Ultimately, weezer is duty-bound to deliver exactly the album that they
want to hear, untainted by even the slightest of compromises, and they can only
hope that that’s the same album that everyone else wants to hear.
The rest of the album recording apparently went off without interference, but
you’ve got to wonder how the "advice" and "suggestions"
affected the way the band and crew performed. After the recording and mixing
were completed, Karl posted
this bit of bipolar corporate doublespeak:
02/17/2001:…Well, the moment of truth has come and
gone. A few hours ago, our meeting with the record company went down, about how
they feel about the (99 percent) finished weezer record…and we have recieved
the word, finally. I think it best for me to just present the facts and let you
guys mull it over, because were not exactly sure how to take this. First of all,
the record company told weezer that they LOVE the record, and had nothing but
supportive and excited things to say about it. All the comments and talk being
spoken tonight was positive and definately the kind of things we were hoping
they would say. And these were thoughtful and insightful comments, not just
empty enthusiasm. It seems that all the late night recording and mixing and
countless hours of detail work to the point of total exhaustion have paid off.
While it is of course YOUR opinions that matter most to weezer, getting the
record company on weezer’s side is simply essential to the process…so, right
on! However…at the same time, we were told that they no longer wish to release
the album on April 17th, as we were originally told. In fact, they would not
even supply us with a replacement date, which effectively throws the release
date into thin air. When will they let weezer release this album? From their
excited talk, we had figured that they would have wanted to put it out
"yesterday"…. But now, its become a total mystery…
I attended the concert in Chicago on March 9, and wrote about how
it had left me feeling. The new songs sounded
good. The old songs sounded just like the recorded versions. They didn’t play
for very long. But I think my biggest problem with the show was that I spent
most of the time up in the balcony where it was too quiet and comfortable
instead of being down on the floor where I belonged. My fault. I won’t make that
mistake again.
The final bit of Record Company flack that Karl
wrote about had to do with
release dates:
04/12/2001: …Speaking of release dates, some folks have
been writing me in a panic, having heard of further delays to the US release. I
can assure you direct from the band itself that this is NOT so, and that may
15th is the date! It is true that the record label had tried to further push
it back till June, but this did NOT go over well with the band…in a heated
behind the scenes debate with some label higher-ups, the exasperated guys got
their way, and May 15th stuck!
Since then the only troubling comments I have read have come from interviews
with the band. In an
interview with the LA Times, Rivers talks about the effect of Pinkerton
selling less than a fifth of the first album:
"That was a devastating
disappointment," says Cuomo, 30. " ‘Cause at the time I felt we had
come up with something really new and fresh and exciting and important. It was
very personal to me also.
"And we put it out and everyone said they
hated it, just across the board—our fans, all the critics. It was just the
worst stab in the heart. And that was definitely one of the factors that led to
me not being able to leave my room for a few years."
I didn’t hate it. My wife reminded me today that I didn’t love it at
first, but I’m sure I respected it as growth. I can understand why he was upset,
but I think the only people who really hated Pinkerton were the
simpleminded dopes at MTV. But Rivers’ predictions about the new album surprised
me:
"I don’t expect it to succeed
commercially, unlike everyone at the record company," he says.
"They’re all gonna be incredibly disappointed in a few weeks.
"The thing that I’m worried about, and this
is a real concern, is that I also think our fans are gonna hate it."
Uh oh. Maybe he’s preparing everybody for the worst. Trying to downplay
expectations. I can dig that. A little reverse telepsychokinesis (or something).
But here’s what scared me:
"There were songs on the [first] album that
were pointing the way to a personal, confessional style, and that’s what I got
really excited about as I went to do ‘Pinkerton.’ But now I’m just totally
closed. I think they’re gonna miss the extreme emotionalism.
"They’re gonna say, ‘He doesn’t sing with any
feeling anymore, he’s not letting his feelings out.’ And the truth is, I miss
that too. But all things considered, I think this is a stronger record. This
record stands on its own without having to manipulate people’s emotions."
And it’s true the new album seems to completely lack the extreme emotionalism
that I love about Pinkerton and parts of the first album. And it doesn’t
have any weird sounds. Nothing that makes you stop what you were doing and say,
"What the hell was that?" It’s a good record with some really nice
songs on it. But I can already tell that it won’t make it in my CD player past
the summer. There are no songs that I absolutely have to put on mix tapes for my
friends, like "No One Else" or "Across the Sea" or even
"The Good Life." I like the single, "Hash Pipe," but I don’t
really care about it.
We’ll see. Maybe I’ll change my mind. Lester Bangs hated Exile on Main
Street when it first came out. But I’m pretty sure that the new Weezer album
is no Exile. I mean, it’s less than 29 minutes long, and come on, they didn’t
even bother to give it a name. Has there
ever been a band to release two separate self-titled albums?
But I’m still a fan. And I’m anxious to download the b-sides and outtakes and new
live stuff. And even though I feel let down, I’m already excited about their
next album.
"I would like to say one thing, and that’s
that I hope people stick with us. All these records are just phases I go
through, and when you’re younger and kind of inexperienced, you go through more
extreme phases, and ‘Pinkerton’ is maybe on the emotionally extreme side.
"This record is on the anti-emotional extreme
side. And I hope people stick with us, because in the future I’ll be going back
and forth and probably finding some middle ground that makes us all happy."
Let’s hope this one sells millions of copies so they feel liberated enough to
follow it up with a little bit of forward evolution. Is that lame of me to even
think that way? Am I being suckered by a corporate marketing machine into
consuming goods I don’t even enjoy? I honestly don’t know. After all, I’m just a
fan.

john
3805 days ago
damn. it’s like you said what i was thinking. :}
Tina
3774 days ago
Personally,I enjoy the extreme emotion of Pinkerton, but that could just be because I’m a younger fan. But I do understand the thing about growing up with the music, it is true.
DJMurph
1102 days ago
Just sayin’, but these bands/artists released more than one self-titled album: Weezer (duh), Peter Gabriel, Seal, and Cheap Trick. There very well may be more, but I’m not sure.